Posts Tagged ‘montana Aquatic Insects’

Yellowstone River Oil Spill- Redeux

Tuesday, August 23rd, 2011

Well, you may have noticed that I have not said anything about the Yellowstone River Oil Spill since our original entry. Yet, in truth, we have been busily working on the project in-house.  The experience has not been all-together positive; quite the contrary. This entry deals with how the public loses because of bureaucracy; bureaucracy of the corporate breed, not the  governmental red tape I’d expected.

After the oil spill, we contacted Montana Department of Environmental Quality (MT DEQ) for information, they put us in contact with Montana Fish Wildlife and Parks, who deferred us to ExxonMoble’s contact, who put us in touch with a consultant. We discussed my qualifications and my previous work and he reckoned they could use me and my team for the aquatic insect assessments to describe the impact and the recovery of the Yellowstone ecosystem. He sent me an email about once a week to say, they were still trying to bring us on board. After several weeks, he said I better get an OSHA hazardous materials certification and that there was no way around the requirement if I want to work on the Yellowstone River. Several hundred dollars and 3 working-days later (per trainee), we completed the certification.  I informed the contact that we had completed OSHA training as required and didn’t hear back from him for over a week. He said, sorry, “Sorry don’t think its going to work out.” I wrote him a scathing letter; which he apparently passes along to ARCADIS (Exxon’s Primary firm for everything), the next thing I know, I received an 158-page listing of ExxonMoble’s contracting requirements and several 6-9 page contract specifics and insurance requirements.   Again, these were corporate regulations, not governmental regulations.  I had my insurance agent looking into the extra coverages required and it was apparent that it was going to be very costly to bring our $2-million insurance coverage up to the “required” $9-million; just to collect insects by the riverside.

We were working on finalizing their insurance needs when I recieved the following note (today).

“Brett,
It looks like the clock has run out. We have had to mobilize a small field effort to obtain representative macroinvertebrate samples from the spill area. We needed to get out there before fall influenced the life stages we are sampling. Apologies to you if I was in any way misleading regarding your potential role, but we simply did not comprehend the bureaucratic log jams we ran into. Best of luck in the future.”

Ok. So, I am a little embarrassed by my trusting nature and the way I let the corporate dudes string me along.  And, I have always been critical of critics, even when I am the critic.  It is easy to criticize a process or organization, but unless you offer a viable alternative, it amounts to nothing but whining.  My way of dealing with this is to turn it in to something positive.

I reckon that, in preparation for this project it has cost me time, materials, and training fees, totaling nearly $7,300. Interesting that for just another 3o hours of my staff’s time, vehicle costs, and motel lodging, we can collect the samples in a scientifically relevant way.  Therefore, I am proud to announce that we are initiating the Yellowstone Biological Assessment Project, independently, as a community service. There will be laboratory time as well, but hey, that’s what winter nights are for, right…. (?)

If we do not ante up, and get this done right, there will be lots of paper pushed, but the world will be no closer to understanding the impacts of Exxon’s Oil spill on the Yellowstone River ecosystem. Our survey will not be able to cover everything, but it will provide more information than either the state, or Exxon will gather.

We will be sampling this week.   I’ll keep you posted. Full-speed ahead!

I have to screen comments to keep the spam out, but please, I do appreciate them. Click the link below to comment :)

Odonata: Montana & Wyoming Aquatic Entomology Notes

Wednesday, August 4th, 2010

the mona lisaSo I started with one of my favorite little beetles, the Haliplids, but really, honestly… the aquatic insect with which the general public is most fascinated is probably the Odonata (dragonflies and damselflies). This seems to exclude fly-fisher-persons from the category of general public (because of their obsession with mayflies, caddisflies, and stoneflies). But, lets just consider fly-fishers exceptional members of the general public, that are out numbered by people with a certain nostalgia for the lazy summer days of their childhood. So powerful is the connection of Odonata with these memories, that many sylized dragonflies are emblazoned on many house items are commonly available (Wal Mart, k-Mart, Tiffany & Co.).   I believe most people associate these images with some un-nameable inner peace, but maybe that’s just me.  I do know one woman, who thinks dragonflies are nothing more than sexual predators, but she has issues (which may or may not be justified; who am I to judge?).

The images associated with this post are from the Wyoming Educational Benthic Imaging Project, funded by the Wyoming Assoication of Conservation Districts, who along with EcoAnalysts, retains a limited copy right to the images. As the artist I retain full copy rights. if you’d like to use them, please let me know. Just please be sure to give credit where credit is due.

This dragonfly family is the Gomphidae; known as club-tails or Snake-tails because of the adult’s expanded abdomen, somewhat resembling the “hood” of a cobra. Honestly, it was so long ago when I examined these specimens, I don’t remember their genus. Still, there are generalizations about the gomphids that can be drawn from discussing these specimens–some of which apply to most (or all) dragonflies and damselflies.  For those curious specifically about dragonflies in Montana and Wyoming, I cam tell you that the most commonly collected genus of Gomphidae in the region appears to be Ophiogomphus sp.; this could be largely because of where people are sampling (riffle areas in valley streams).gomphid head

The fact that these dragonflies covered with bits of fine detritus tells something about their way of life. The gomphid dragonflies are burrowers; they burrow into sand or silt and wait just below the surface for a prey animal to wriggle into striking range.  The complete and total coating of this nymph with sediments probably reflects the the nature its habitat. Specifically, the sediment were this critter was collected is probably much more organic than the habitats used by the upper specimens.  Seeing this specimen with hairs, antennae and even its eyes coated with a layer of “dirt” might suggest this critter was in a habitat that is somewhat inhospitable. However, this specimen was very large–nearly complete larval development–suggesting that this degree of sediment did not affect the    Other species very likely could not survive this amount of organic sediment. For example, the function of mayfly gills would very likely be impeded by a similar coating; resulting in suffocation.

Educators: here is a thought question to ask your students: Why do you think the dragonfly did not suffocate, where many mayflies would?

This specimen gave me a nice chance to photgraph something that is usually a little hard to photograph: the feeding structures of larval dragonflies. [NOTE: larval dragonflies are sometimes incorrectly called "nymphs," but this term refers to animals with "incomplete metamorphosis" (e.g., true bugs, grasshoppers, cockroaches) not those that are paurometabolus (mayflies, stoneflies, dragonflies, damselflies).] The principle adaptation of dragonfly larvae to the predatory life style is the modified labium (lower lip). This structure takes many forms in different insect species, but in dragonflies it is greatly elongated and hinged. The picture here shows the structure, viewed from under the head.  Often, the details of these structures do not photograph well, becasuse of a lack of contrast (yellow-white, on yellow-while, with low depth of field= poor photo). however, the sediment on this specimen allowed for a wide range of contrasts. Imagine this large plate-like structure folded at the lower-right corner of the photo, so that its total length is about 2 times what you see here.  Larval dragonflies, are slow movers; they are lie-in-wait predators. Unlike predatory stoneflies which chase down their prey dragonflies slowly stalk prey and wait for it to come into range.  Although, dragonflies are slow movers, they can rapidly compress their body, resulting in a brief increase in hydrostatic pressure, that cause the labium to launch forward with amazing speed–hardly visible.  The hooks (upper left of picture) puncture the prey and pull it back to mouth where it is held to be chewed and eaten at leisure.

This feeding style is ubiquitous among the Odonata (both dragonflies and damselflies).   Different species and families have different modifications of the labium and this one of the predominant structures used to differentiate larvae taxonomically and systematically.

Educators: here is a thought question to ask your students: How would growth of larval dragonflies change the kinds of food available to them?

More Aquatic Insects of Montana and Wyoming

Wednesday, July 28th, 2010
Crawling water beetle

Haliplus from Niobrara Conservation District.

Earlier, I promised to follow up with some discussion based on some of my Aquatic Insect photographs.

Technical mumbo-jumbo

I like this photograph. It is a composite image of about 20 photographs–each taken at a different depth of field–then integrated using image analysis software. I took it while working on the Wyoming Educational Benthic Imaging project. During the project I worked for EcoAnalysts, but the budget required much of my personal time (nights and weekends)for, therefore i specifically retained the artist’s copyright, while allowing limited copyrights to both EcoAnalysts Inc. and the Wyoming Association of Conservation Districts.  If you are interested in using these pictures, please write me and I will provide the necessary permissions–Just be sure to give credit where it is due :)

About the Critter

The subject is  Haliplus sp., a haliplid beetle (Coleoptera: Haliplidae). The common name for this family of beetles is the “crawling water beetles”.

In life, when you find one of these tiny guys (~2 mm) they usually appear to be frantically running along the bottom of a pool or your collection jar. Although they “crawl,” they appear to do so at great speed, frantically.  Definitely distinct from the slow methodical crawling of some of the damselflies or dragonflies, as well as from the smooth, multidimensional swimming of Dytiscids, Noterids, and Hyrophilids.  The adult haliplids push themselves downward as they swim which helps them disappear in to the fine sediments that are often collected with them.

lateral view of Haliplus sp.

One of the things that make haliplids unique is that they breathe air from an air bubble that they carry around with them.  Of course, other beetles (e.g., Dytiscids, Hydrophilids), and even some hemipterans (e.g., Corixidae, Notonectidae) also breathe air from bubbles carried around with them. However, the method of retaining the bubble is unique from all other groups of aquatic insects.  Halipidae are united by the morphological expansion of the rear coxae (think hip joints) into large flat plates, which hold a portable air bubble against the body (see above). This is one of the first key characters in many keys to identifying aquatic beetles, and if you’ve never seen it, the text can be confusing. Fortunately, a picture is worth a thousand words and once you see it you will never mistake any other feature for the expanded coxal plates of  the Haliplidae.  Most photographs of this feature exhibit the full-on ventral view– which is useful and shows the lovely sculpture of each plate (bottom)… but it is hard to appreciate the role the feature in respiration from this view.  For this reason, i really like my oblique angle shots (above).

A number of years ago I saw a film made of one of these beetles feeding before. i think it was by Win Fairchild or one of his students. the mouth parts acted like a little sewing machine pulling filamentous algae through like thread… their were spines on the mouth parts that were spaced appropriately for size of some filamentous algae. the spines pierced each cell, and sucked the juices out… so the thread of algae went in green, and came out empty clear cells…. very efficient.

Well that’s all the time for now… if you’d like to discuss… please post a comment. or use my contact page.

Ventral Peltodytes

Standard ventral view

The vental view shows how plates from below.