Posts Tagged ‘sedimentation’

~Jefferson River Montana~

Friday, June 25th, 2010

The Jefferson River Flooded last weekend. All the hay fields in the area were flooded and roads that have not been submerged in recent history became gentle rivulets. The High water is good for the Jefferson River because it has had many years of below average flows–and fine sediments have built up among the interstitial spaces were many invertebrates that are important fish forage live.

When Snorkeling in recent years, I have found that if you pick up a cobble, there is beneath it only sand. Typically, you might expect to find more cobbles under cobbles. Among the sand grains are the burrows of several sediment dwelling invertebrates (e.g., Hexagenia and Ephoron sp.). According to locals, the river once supported impressive hatches of large stoneflies (Hesperoperla pacifica, Pteronarcys sp. etc).

When sediment fills in the the area under the stones, much of the habitat used buy large stone flies is lost because the interstitial spaces are simply too small for them to pass through. This results in smaller populations (of large invertebrates), and ultimately smaller hatches. It may also reduce the forage available for fish. For example, it appears that sedimentation of the Jefferson River may have caused Burrowing dragonflies (Gomphidae) to replace many of the large predatory stoneflies typically expected. We sampled the Jefferson River several years ago and found about 2-3 gomphid dragonflies per square foot and about 0.3 large stoneflies in the same area–the dragonflies were nearly 10x times as abundant as the stoneflies.  We are hopeful  that high river levels will scour sand from interstitial spaces and improve survival of stoneflies. This could result in an improvement in fishing a few years down the road…

Aside from benefiting river ecology, another effect of the flood is that pools and back waters that have not been flooded for years have now been nicely inundated for a week or more. Mosquito eggs can remain dormant for several years–until they become wet.  We found hundreds of thousands of mature mosquito larvae and pupae among the grassy ditches and fields last weekend. There were so many larvae, that in just a few minutes we observed hundreds of larvae washing across the road in shallow riffles (picture below).  By this weekend or early next week the Jefferson Valley will likely be swarmed by endless squadrons mosquitoes… and it has been such a nice spring.  If you can tolerate the bites and buzzing it might be a nice weekend to try mosquito-mimic flies… and if you have a friend who owns a hay field… maybe see if you can get permission to fish it!

mosquitoes float across the road

~New Fork River~

Thursday, June 24th, 2010
The Mona Lisa

Photo: B. Marshall

We have been working most of the winter on samples from the New Fork River and the Upper Green River in Sublette County Wyoming. It is fun to get back into the grove of identifying samples.   We just hired a new Technician Esmeralda (who’s bio is not yet posted on the web page) to help make the report deadline. Esmeralda is incredibly efficient and a welcome relief to laboratory staff.  Sorting is now proceeding at a much faster pace.

One of the interesting specimens we’ve found is a tusked Paraleptophlebia nymph.  There are two western species of Paraleptophlebia that have tusks that are believed to assist with burrowing (P. bicornuta and P. Packi). The outer margin of the mandible is expanded to form the tusks and the head is more directed forward (prognathous) than in other species of Paraleptophlebia making the nymphs appear different and more predatory.

Edmunds and McCafterty (1996) compared the behaviors of burrowing mayflies and reported, “Paraleptophlebia packi forms burrows in silt, whereas P. bicornuta is an interstitial dweller.”  It would be interesting to differentiate these species because the impacts we have been discussing in the report are related localized sedimentation related to gas well development and other land use activities. Changes in the relative abundance of these species might result from changes in the amount of sediment entrained in the river. Unfortunately it is very difficult to separate nymphs of these species with “nice” specimens and ours are not in ideal condition. Furthermore, it is not clear when the tusks become apparent; many of our younger Paraleptophlebia nymphs may be P. packi or P. bicornuta that have not yet developed the prominent tusks which differentiate them from other species. Thus, even if we were to differentiate the species with mature speciemens, ontogenic  morphological changes within the species might cause spurious results when most of the nymphs are immature.

Thought Question: How else might ontogeny affect biological assessments of streams and rivers?